Skip to main content

U.S. Supreme Court Begins Arguments Over Fate Of Obamacare Law

 


The conservative-majority United States (U.S.) Supreme Court yesterday began hearing arguments in a challenge by Republican-governed states backed by President Donald Trump’s administration aiming to invalidate the Obamacare healthcare law.

President-elect Joe Biden has criticised Republican efforts to throw out the Affordable Care Act (ACA), as the law is formally known, in the midst of a deadly coronavirus pandemic and hopes to buttress Obamacare after taking office on January 20.

The justices were hearing a scheduled 80 minutes of arguments by teleconference in an appeal by a coalition of Democratic-governed states, including California and New York and the Democratic-led House of Representatives to preserve Obamacare.

The case represents the latest Republican legal attack on the 2010 law, which was the signature domestic policy achievement of Democratic former President Barack Obama, under whom Biden served as vice president. The Supreme Court in 2012 and 2015 fended off previous Republican challenges to it.

The Supreme Court has a 6-3 conservative majority after the Republican-led Senate last month confirmed Trump’s third appointee, Amy Coney Barrett. Most legal experts think the justices will stop short of a seismic ruling striking down Obamacare.

A group of states led by Texas, later joined by Trump’s administration, sued in 2018 in Texas to strike down the law.

If Obamacare were to be struck down, up to 20 million Americans could lose medical insurance and insurers could once again refuse to cover people with pre-existing medical conditions. Obamacare expanded public healthcare programmes and created marketplaces for private insurance.

“We believe there are nine justices who connect the dots and see how important this is,” said California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, a Democrat, who is leading the coalition of 20 states defending Obamacare.

“We think there’s a very strong chance that Americans will continue to have good healthcare coverage,” Becerra added.

Texas-based U.S. District Court Judge Reed O’Connor in 2018 ruled that Obamacare was unconstitutional as currently structured in light of a Republican-backed change made by Congress a year earlier.

The New Orleans-based 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals last year partially upheld that ruling, saying the law’s “individual mandate,” which required people to obtain insurance or pay a financial penalty, afoul of the Constitution. But the 5th Circuit stopped short of striking down the law. The Democratic-led states and the House then appealed to the Supreme Court.

The 2012 Supreme Court ruling upheld most Obamacare provisions, including the individual mandate. The court defined this penalty as a tax and thus found the law permissible under the Constitution’s provision empowering Congress to levy taxes.

In 2017, Trump signed a law that eliminated the financial penalty under the individual mandate, which gave rise to the Republican lawsuit. With that change, the individual mandate could no longer be interpreted as a tax provision and was therefore unlawful, the Republican challengers argued.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

$114.28m COVID-19 loan: SERAP asks World Bank to make Nigeria ‘publicly commit to transparency’

Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project, (SERAP) has sent an open letter to the World Bank President Mr David Malpass, urging him to use his “good offices to encourage the Federal Government and 36 state governments to publicly commit to transparency and accountability in the spending of the $114.28m credit and grant for COVID-19, which the Bank’s Board of Directors recently approved for Nigeria, including by publishing details on a dedicated websit". SERAP also urged Mr Malpass to “put pressure on authorities and the 36 state governors to accept voluntary scrutiny by Nigerians and civil society regarding the spending of the funds and use of the resources, including on how they will spend the money to buy medical equipment, and improve access to clean water, sanitation and hygiene" The World Bank Board of Directors last Friday approved a $114.28 financing “to help Nigeria prevent, detect and respond to the threat posed by COVID-19 with a specific focus on state level...

I First Strangled Usifo Before Stabbing Him— Chidinma, Killer Of Super TV CEO

   The 300-level Mass Communication student of the University of Lagos, UNILAG, who was arrested last Wednesday, over the murder of Chief Executive Officer, Super TV, Usifo Ataga, in a service apartment in the Lekki area of Lagos State, says she was able to kill him because he was weak. Ojukwu also lamented that she has been seeing her victim's face in her dream since she took his life. She made the revelations about the murder of the 50-year-old. Th 21-year-old lady said she wished she would wake up to realise the whole saga was only a dream. " I have never had peace since the day I was arrested. Never in my wildest imagination did I envisage I would kill a human being. I see his face in my dream every night. At times I would be scared to sleep. I have been begging God for forgiveness. This is not what I wanted for myself. I don’t know what fate holds for me. I am also begging his family to forgive me, especially his children. Ah! God, what have I done?” she exclaimed, buryin...

Young Men Seen Cutting Themselves With Cutlass Without A Single Trace Of Blood

Pictures and videos of a men cutting themselves with a cutlass and with no blood seen have hit social media. In a display of true voodoo, these men like in the old Nigerian movie ”Isakaba” were cutting themselves without bleeding. Pictures show one man on top of another and shockingly trying to gush him but to no avail. These men who supposedly were endowed with some kind of supernatural power laid down still while this man shoved his cutlass unsuccessfully through their bellies . SEE PICTURES & VIDEO BELOW: https://gistlobby.com.ng/2021/01/12/videoyoung-men-seen-cutting-themselves-with-cutlass-without-a-single-trace-of-blood/